Bug#299074: Fw: Re: SunBlade D-I problems

2005-03-15 Thread Jurij Smakov
tags 299074 patch thanks That'd be the case. My system has four sbus nodes. The first one is empty other than the socal. The hme and esp are located on the second and fourth busses. Let me know when you get something to test for this and I'll give it a go on the 4500. Would prefer 2.6 netboot image

Bug#299074: Fw: Re: SunBlade D-I problems

2005-03-14 Thread David S. Miller
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:57:08 -0500 (EST) Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It only looks for (and scans for devices on) the first one > it finds. I am reassigning this report to dicover1 and will try to cook up > a patch for that. Perfect. sun4d systems would need such a fix as well, t

Bug#299074: Fw: Re: SunBlade D-I problems

2005-03-14 Thread Ben Collins
> RC3 is not yet released. Anyway, I don't believe that this is an installer > problem. After looking at sample tree nodes and discover1 code I came to > the conclusion that detection fails because it does not handle correctly > the situation in which there are multiple sbus nodes present in the

Bug#299074: Fw: Re: SunBlade D-I problems

2005-03-14 Thread Jurij Smakov
retitle 299074 Only scans first node when multiple sbus nodes are present reassign 299074 discover1 thanks Hi Ben, On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Ben Collins wrote: Maybe someone could have included me on this bug discussion. Sorry about that. I've joined the discussion on debian-sparc and forgot to CC the

Bug#299074: Fw: Re: SunBlade D-I problems

2005-03-14 Thread Ben Collins
Maybe someone could have included me on this bug discussion. The date of my filing the bug, I downloaded the install-sparc/current/ image to use. I'm not sure what version that is. I believe it is rc3, but it may be rc2 (when was rc3 released?). I do know that I used 2.6 images, and maybe that it