Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for maildir

2006-09-09 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello, > Also consider symlinks in the path, etc. Really, your best approach as > far as I understand is to use realpath() on the filename/path of the > mailbox before md5-ing it. yes, it is. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for maildir

2006-09-09 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 07:10]: >> Just in case you didn't spot it already. > I described from the lists. >>> If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it >>> using "mutt -f Mail/drow",

Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for maildir

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Dato, * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 07:10]: > Just in case you didn't spot it already. I described from the lists. > > If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it using > > "mutt -f Mail/drow", the header cache creates a second cache. They're > > the

Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for maildir

2005-03-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.6-20040907+3 Severity: normal If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it using "mutt -f Mail/drow", the header cache creates a second cache. They're the same mailbox, but one is "Mail/drow" and the other is "/home/drow/Mail/drow". This could conc