On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:40:04PM +0100, Andras Korn wrote:
> While it looks like a good idea, it wouldn't solve my specific problem as I
> can't depend on ports other than 22 being reachable by my clients.
that sounds like a very exotic case, but yeah, in this case, you really
need in-protocol v
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:12:14PM +0100, chrysn wrote:
> [srv record based solution that puts different virtualhosts on different
> tcp ports]
>
> andras, would this solve your problem?
While it looks like a good idea, it wouldn't solve my specific problem as I
can't depend on ports other than
2 matches
Mail list logo
