> reassign 296708 libgphoto2-2
> tag 296708 + patch
> thanks
tag 296708 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Thanks a lot Aurelien; forwarded and applied upstream. I'll build a
new libgphoto2 package now.
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
reassign 296708 libgphoto2-2
tag 296708 + patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AJ> Some more progress on that bug. I have looked at the libgphoto2
> AJ> sources, and there is something re
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> Some more progress on that bug. I have looked at the libgphoto2
AJ> sources, and there is something really strange. All buffers are
AJ> 4096 bytes long whereas the requested data size is 32778 bytes.
AJ> This was not a p
Some more progress on that bug. I have looked at the libgphoto2 sources,
and there is something really strange. All buffers are 4096 bytes long
whereas the requested data size is 32778 bytes.
This was not a problem with the previous implementation of libusb as it
seems that the camera always retu
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have build a fixed version of libgphoto2 available on
> http://temp.aurel32.net/libgphoto2
Don't forget to use a version of libusb that was segfaulting!
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debi
reopen 296708
thanks
Bad news! I have talked with the upstream of libusb, and he thinkg this
could not be a fix, but only a bad workaround. So the bug seems to be
in gphoto2.
I have looked at the latest logs (test2 and test3) you send me, and he
seems to be right as the amount of the data receive
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:29:53PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:52:26PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > AJ> BTW, the original bug report mentions you are using a kernel
> > AJ> 2.6.9. Are you still using the same kernel?
> >
> > Yes. (And don't forget libusb-
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:54:02PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> test3 (please note this one doesn't segfault and produces expected
> output):
Nice !
The only difference between test2 and test3 version is the size of
blocks that are requested to the device. 16kB in test2 and 4kB in test3.
It seems
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> I have just produced two new test versions (test2 and test3),
AJ> which should output some more debugging infos (that I hope
AJ> useful). Could you please test them (no need to use a debug
AJ> mode) and send me the output
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:52:26PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> AJ> BTW, the original bug report mentions you are using a kernel
> AJ> 2.6.9. Are you still using the same kernel?
>
> Yes. (And don't forget libusb-0.1-4 1:0.1.8-17 still works perfectly.)
The way libusb communicate with t
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> Could you please send me the log of both libusb (the test
AJ> version) and gphoto2 in debug mode?
gphoto2 debug, strace gphoto2 and libusb debug logs are here:
all-logs.bz2
Description: Binary data
AJ> BTW, the original
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Unfortunately it still segfaults. Here is the log:
That's strange, that doesn't seems to correspond to what gphoto2 says.
Could you please send me the log of both libusb (the test version)
and gphoto2 in debug mode?
BTW, the origi
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> Could you please test this version with USB_DEBUG=255 ?
AJ> http://temp.aurel32.net/libusb/test/
Unfortunately it still segfaults. Here is the log:
usb-test-log
Description: Binary data
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
If we ar
Hi!
After looking at the logs you send me and at the code, I may have found
a problem. It seems to be possible that the kernel returns less data
than expected, but returns some data. This is currently not handle in
libusb.
Could you please test this version with USB_DEBUG=255 ?
http://temp.aurel3
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> Could you please try with USB_DEBUG=255 ?
Here is the output:
usb-log
Description: Binary data
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
When you're in a fight with an idiot, it's difficult for other people to tell
which one the idiot is.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:34:49PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AJ> Next step, could you please run gphoto2 in debugging mode to see
> AJ> if there is something interesting in the output. For that, just
> AJ> run gphoto2 --d
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> Milan Zamazal a écrit :
> >AJ> Milan, could you please run USBDEBUG=255 gphoto2
> >AJ> put_your_args_here, and send me the result?
> >
> >This doesn't output anything.
> Ok, I need to understand why.
I given the wrong variab
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ> Next step, could you please run gphoto2 in debugging mode to see
AJ> if there is something interesting in the output. For that, just
AJ> run gphoto2 --debug put_your_args_here
Here's the output:
gphoto2-debug-log.bz2
Desc
Milan Zamazal a écrit :
AJ> Milan, could you please run USBDEBUG=255 gphoto2
AJ> put_your_args_here, and send me the result?
This doesn't output anything.
Ok, I need to understand why.
AJ> Also, doing an strace (just run strace gphoto2
AJ> put_your_args_here,) would be useful.
I'll
> "FP" == Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FP> I rebuilt libgphoto2 against the new libusb; could you test the
FP> packages from http://people.debian.org/~fpeters/libgphoto2/ ?
No change, it still segfaults.
> "AJ" == Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AJ>
Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Package: libgphoto2-2
> Version: 2.1.5-3
> Severity: important
>
> After I upgraded libusb-0.1-4 to the version 1:0.1.10-2, I can no longer
> download photos from my Olympus C-2100UZ camera, gphoto2 segfaults on any
> attempt to communicate with the camera, e.g. after `gphot
Frederic Peters a écrit :
Hi Aurelien
Hi!
Did the new libusb break ABI ? I can rebuild libgphoto2 against the
new version but this won't fix other packages using libusb.
No, the ABI is still the same. What has changed is the way to
communicate with the kernel, the newer version allow bigger packe
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.1.5-3
Severity: important
After I upgraded libusb-0.1-4 to the version 1:0.1.10-2, I can no longer
download photos from my Olympus C-2100UZ camera, gphoto2 segfaults on any
attempt to communicate with the camera, e.g. after `gphoto2 --summary'.
The same happens wit
23 matches
Mail list logo
