Bug#296549: no way to not update not-safe-for-work channels

2005-03-07 Thread Johan Svedberg
* Mar 08 02:23 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 03:28:46PM +0100, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > * Feb 22 23:32 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I wish there was a way to not update not-safe-for-work channels at > > > work. > > > > Upstreams says: > > > > "What does this bu

Bug#296549: no way to not update not-safe-for-work channels

2005-03-07 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:37:54AM +0100, Johan Svedberg wrote: > * Mar 08 02:23 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 03:28:46PM +0100, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > > * Feb 22 23:32 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I wish there was a way to not update not-safe-for-work ch

Bug#296549: no way to not update not-safe-for-work channels

2005-03-07 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 03:28:46PM +0100, Johan Svedberg wrote: > * Feb 22 23:32 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I wish there was a way to not update not-safe-for-work channels at > > work. > > Upstreams says: > > "What does this bug mean, the DBTS report doesn't seem to say anything > more.

Bug#296549: no way to not update not-safe-for-work channels

2005-03-07 Thread Johan Svedberg
* Feb 22 23:32 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I wish there was a way to not update not-safe-for-work channels at > work. Upstreams says: "What does this bug mean, the DBTS report doesn't seem to say anything more. Closing, doesn't make any sense to me." Matt, if you still want to push for t

Bug#296549: no way to not update not-safe-for-work channels

2005-02-22 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: blam Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: wishlist I wish there was a way to not update not-safe-for-work channels at work. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature