Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Hi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2005, Erik Scharwaechter wrote: > $ objdump -T /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 | grep g_assert_warning > $ It definitely is, if this glib doesn't come from Debian, please remove it. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Neutral President: I have no strong fe

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

On Monday 28 February 2005 19.01, you wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > > Setting up libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.2-3) ... > > Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.4.0...Cannot load > > module /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: > > /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodule

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > Setting up libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.2-3) ... > Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.4.0...Cannot load > module /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: > /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: > undefined symbol: g_assert_warning

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.6.2-3 Followup-For: Bug #296211 Hi, I'm running a Sarge system, but I've got exactly the same problem. Loïc Minier wrote: > Now please run and paste the output of these commands: >objdump -T /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so | grep g_assert_warning >ldd /usr/lib/gtk

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > I was a happy sid user until a couple of weeks ago. Then - after an upgrade > (an upgrade issued in dselect, my favorite tool) - GTK was gone. Firefox > didn't work, and I had no time to solve this problem. Yday evening I took a > look on i

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

On Monday 21 February 2005 13.08, you wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > > > (Please keep the bug id in Cc:.) > > Please keep the bug in Cc:. > Excuse me for forgetting again to cc. > > deb ftp://ftp.bme.hu/OS/Linux/dist/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free > >

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > > (Please keep the bug id in Cc:.) Please keep the bug in Cc:. > deb ftp://ftp.bme.hu/OS/Linux/dist/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free Is this an up-to-date mirror? Anyway, if you've used "dpkg" to update your packages, that's prob

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

On Monday 21 February 2005 09.25, you wrote: > severity 296211 important > tags 296211 - experimental > thanks > > Hi, > > On lun, fév 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > > Package: libgtk2.0-0 > > Version: 2.4.14-2 > > Severity: critical > > Tags: experimental > > This is the second bug you re

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Hi, (Please keep the bug id in Cc:.) On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > > This is the second bug you report with severity higher than important > > and with the tag "experimental". Why are you using that tag? > Thought that the tag is independent from the severity of the bug.

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

severity 296211 important tags 296211 - experimental thanks Hi, On lun, fév 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote: > Package: libgtk2.0-0 > Version: 2.4.14-2 > Severity: critical > Tags: experimental This is the second bug you report with severity higher than important and with the tag "experime

Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols

Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.4.14-2 Severity: critical Tags: experimental -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packag