On Fri May 16, 2008 at 17:24:43 -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> Please ask if members of the Security Audit project could review the
> setuid program in the bugreport and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any
> findings or discussion. (As this is a non-Debian mailing list requiring
> subscription to post
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:58:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:16:05PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:30:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 07:36:14PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:36
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:16:05PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:30:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 07:36:14PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > > - The pat
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:30:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 07:36:14PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> > > > - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> > >
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 07:36:14PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> > Hello,
> > > - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> > > unstable.
> > Done. I have attached a patch for unix_auth.c
> > > and, i
Hello,
> >> - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> >> unstable.
>> Done. I have attached a patch for unix_auth.c
Here are the .diff.gz and the .dsc file for my current version of
libpam-unix2.
I created a separate subdirectory for unix2_chkpwd (which will app
Hello,
> I have Cc:'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED], the PAM maintainers:
Here are the .dsc and the .diff.gz file for my current version of
libpam-unix2.
I have included unix2_chkpwd.c and unix2_chkpwd.8 in a separate subdirectory
(which will appear when dpatching), wrote a Makefile, added the necessary
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> > unstable.
>
> Done. I have attached a patch for unix_auth.c
>
> > and, importantly:
> >
> > - we need some some code review/feedback/signof
Hello,
> > - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> > unstable.
>
> Done. I have attached a patch for unix_auth.c
The unnecessary extra empty lines at the end of the file came in by mistake
and can be deleted.
Regards
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
> - The patch needs to be updated to apply against the current package in
> unstable.
Done. I have attached a patch for unix_auth.c
> and, importantly:
>
> - we need some some code review/feedback/ignoff from the Debian folks
> maintaining PAM and other related components. I am *NOT* goi
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:25:24PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >> The former seems to make more sense to me.
>
> >Myself as well, but I'm hesitant to blindly include the old patch unless
> >someone picks it up, updates or rewrites it for current code, and gets
> >some code revie
Hello,
>> The former seems to make more sense to me.
>Myself as well, but I'm hesitant to blindly include the old patch unless
>someone picks it up, updates or rewrites it for current code, and gets
>some code review from current PAM folks.
As far as I can see, my old changes should still appl
tags 295526 help
thanks
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:58:25PM +0100, Charles Darke wrote:
> Just wanted to check status on this and whether the suggested approach
> will be used for libpam-unix2? Refer to bug #440955.
>
> Looks like the options are to make the changes in libpam-unix2 where the
>
Just wanted to check status on this and whether the suggested approach
will be used for libpam-unix2? Refer to bug #440955.
Looks like the options are to make the changes in libpam-unix2 where the
setuid executable can be contained in a small specific file
(unix2_chkpwd) or whether the other o
Hello,
After a long time I just revisited my bug report for libpam-unix2 and
the following discussion.
> If you'd like to help, please run the changes by the current PAM
> policy maintainer Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and also
> upstream, Thorsten Kukuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I'm curious if
15 matches
Mail list logo
