Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've put some packages I've just built of pcre 5.0 at
>
> http://www.mnb.org.uk/pcre/
>
> If you could test these that would be much appreciated. They seem to
> work for me, in as much as pcregrep works and it hasn't broken my very
> simple exim installation
I've put some packages I've just built of pcre 5.0 at
http://www.mnb.org.uk/pcre/
If you could test these that would be much appreciated. They seem to
work for me, in as much as pcregrep works and it hasn't broken my very
simple exim installation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I can look into this
in more depth to see whether one is required or not. There's a good
chance there won't be even though 5.0 supports many more Unicode
properties.
From a five minute look through the header files, I don't believe that
a new soname is required. It seems to
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> PCRE 5.0 was released in September, 2004. It has some features that I
>> would like to use (some support for Unicode character categories), so
>> I'm very interested in seeing packaged. I'm thinking this is probably
>> going to be pcre4, but I haven'
On 2005-02-14 Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: pcre3
> Severity: normal
> PCRE 5.0 was released in September, 2004. It has some features that I
> would like to use (some support for Unicode character categories), so
> I'm very interested in seeing packaged. I'm thinking this
Package: pcre3
Severity: normal
PCRE 5.0 was released in September, 2004. It has some features that I
would like to use (some support for Unicode character categories), so
I'm very interested in seeing packaged. I'm thinking this is probably
going to be pcre4, but I haven't checked into it enou
6 matches
Mail list logo
