On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:46:26PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:38:34PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:51:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:43PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > > The libjpeg62-dev package cur
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:38:34PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:51:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:43PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > The libjpeg62-dev package currently Depends on 'libc6-dev'. In most cases
> > > (including, as far as
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:51:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:43PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > Package: libjpeg6b
> > Version: 6b-9
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > The libjpeg62-dev package currently Depends on 'libc6-dev'. In most cases
> > (including, as far as I
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:29:43PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> Package: libjpeg6b
> Version: 6b-9
> Severity: minor
>
> The libjpeg62-dev package currently Depends on 'libc6-dev'. In most cases
> (including, as far as I can tell, this one), this is an excessively strict
> Dependancy; the value 'li
Package: libjpeg6b
Version: 6b-9
Severity: minor
The libjpeg62-dev package currently Depends on 'libc6-dev'. In most cases
(including, as far as I can tell, this one), this is an excessively strict
Dependancy; the value 'libc6-dev | libc-dev' should suffice (note that you
can't simply do 'libc-dev
5 matches
Mail list logo