Interesting; in another directory it uses include "foo" notation.
Just to be perfectly clear, what it actually does is "include foo",
which does 'define(bar,"bar")' and then the 'include bar' statements
become 'include "bar"'.
So both of them should be supported.
Justin
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at
I checked the code; I don't think that a buffer underflow is possible.
I think that the code was originally built to work as documented
"include foo", but now expects quotation marks around the include
file, since it pretty explicity chops of the last byte as well as the
first two.
I think the re
2 matches
Mail list logo
