Bug#293824: postfix-gld: Update tables.sql to have newer whitelist entries (fwd)

2005-03-10 Thread Micah Anderson
That is great news! It seemed from looking at the website and my attempts to contact the author that they had stopped maintaining the program, but this tells us otherwise. Thanks! micah On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > I would not wait

Bug#293824: postfix-gld: Update tables.sql to have newer whitelist entries (fwd)

2005-03-10 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Micah Anderson wrote: > I would not wait for the upstream to fix this, because it doesn't > look like much activity is happening there... Well, the author told me yesterday that he's preparing release 1.5, so yes, I prefer to wait for now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Bug#293824: postfix-gld: Update tables.sql to have newer whitelist entries (fwd)

2005-03-10 Thread Micah Anderson
I think that it is correct to send this bug to upstream, as they should include the new whitelist entries, however I believe that this can be fixed in the debian package before upstream fixes it. The patch I provided can be used to make a dpatch which will make it work cleanly without modifying the

Bug#293824: postfix-gld: Update tables.sql to have newer whitelist entries

2005-02-05 Thread Micah Anderson
Package: postfix-gld Severity: wishlist Tags: patch A much newer list of known servers that should be setup to automatically whitelist is available online. It seems that this list http://cvs.puremagic.com/viewcvs/greylisting/schema/whitelist_ip.txt is referenced most commonly (it is the one that i