Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2011-12-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.02.05 Hans baier (hansba...@web.de) wrote: Hi, > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 2.0.2-25 > Severity: important > > I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. > This is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. > > The backticks are rendered correctly if vie

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-04-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.02.05 Hans baier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all, > I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. This > is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. > > The backticks are rendered correctly if viewed in xdvi or PDF > generated by pdflatex, whereas they are

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-04-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.04.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all, > Notes: > - One may use t1diff[1] to show differences of the fonts > - I tried to use that tool and got a ps file unfortunately gs was not > able to process it. > > Regards, > Hilmar > > [1] > http://www.kammer.uni-hannover.de/~re

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-04-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
forwarded 293179 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688022 reassign 293179 gsfonts stop On 01.02.05 Hans baier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all, > I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. This > is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. > > The ba

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-02-21 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I guess what Hans is speaking about is the following: > > - create the dvi-file the way he described (pdflatex nfssfont and > latex nfssfont [input as described in the report]) > - dvips nfssfont This gives a warning: dvips: Warning: missing gl

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-02-19 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 02.02.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hans Baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi all, > >>Can you send us an example where the backticks are incorrect? > >> > > Your example nfssfont.ps is renderen incorrect on my system. > > Just to make sure what we expect to see, and what we

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-02-02 Thread Frank Küster
Dear Hans, please keep the bugnumber address in the Cc, so that the mail gets properly archived, and the other maintainers also see it. Hans Baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >>The three files are at >> >>http://people.debian.org/~frank/nfssfont.dvi >>http://people.debian.org/~frank/nfssfont.p

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-02-01 Thread Frank Küster
Hans baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 2.0.2-25 > Severity: important > > I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. > This is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. > > The backticks are rendered correctly if viewed in xdvi > or

Bug#293179: tetex-bin: Bug in font pcrr7tn with dvips: Backticks wrong

2005-02-01 Thread Hans baier
Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-25 Severity: important I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. This is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. The backticks are rendered correctly if viewed in xdvi or PDF generated by pdflatex, whereas they are rendered inc