* Florian Weimer:
> * Kilian Krause:
>
>> yes, that's due to the fact that some other users complained about the
>> -U and -G not working effectively enough for their needs. The dilemma is
>> that either we let asterisk drop privileges *AFTER* setting realtime
>> prio (launching as root and being
Hi Tzafir,
> -G/-U and -p can co--exist peacefully . WorksForMe (Xorcom Rapid).
> Unless in my tests Asterisk silently ignored -p .
but unless i misread the original bug on -G/-U that does only set *one*
group instead of "all groups of the asterisk user".. Thus that's no
solution to that other pr
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:03:46AM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi CuPoTKa,
>
> > Setting AST_REALTIME="yes" to "no" helps, but asterisk starts without
> > high priority.
> >
> > There's no problem starting it from command line, even with -p (high
> > priority) flag. Problem only with init scrip
* Kilian Krause:
> yes, that's due to the fact that some other users complained about the
> -U and -G not working effectively enough for their needs. The dilemma is
> that either we let asterisk drop privileges *AFTER* setting realtime
> prio (launching as root and being limited to one group), or
Hi CuPoTKa,
> Setting AST_REALTIME="yes" to "no" helps, but asterisk starts without
> high priority.
>
> There's no problem starting it from command line, even with -p (high
> priority) flag. Problem only with init script.
yes, that's due to the fact that some other users complained about the
-U
5 matches
Mail list logo