On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:10:37PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Heu, the above doesn't seem to fail in the diagnostic of what the new version
> should be fixing though. Gene, are you sure the disk actually had a partition
> table, and if so, what was it ? Also, could you see what the kernel has to s
Thanks. I'll probably be trying it over the weekend. - Gene
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:27:11PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 07:36, Gene Cooperman wrote:
> > I tried to use the Debian installer with Debian testing
> > (Sarge, version of 1/17/05, rc2 release). Unfortunate
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:27:11PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 07:36, Gene Cooperman wrote:
> > I tried to use the Debian installer with Debian testing
> > (Sarge, version of 1/17/05, rc2 release). Unfortunately, when it
> > came to partitioning, I selected
> > "manually
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 07:36, Gene Cooperman wrote:
> I tried to use the Debian installer with Debian testing
> (Sarge, version of 1/17/05, rc2 release). Unfortunately, when it
> came to partitioning, I selected
> "manually partition"
> and was presented only with the possibility of partitio
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Jan 17, 2005, official RC2, CD Image by
http from Debian Web pages
uname -a: INSTALL FAILED (both under linux26 and normal linux boot)
Date: Jan. 24, 2005
Method: Boot from CD; Initial install with Debian CD-1 already failed
5 matches
Mail list logo
