Bug#290454: Manual compile seems to confirm initial error

2005-01-14 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I checked the list archives for lucene-user and lucene-dev; there is no mention of kaffe anywhere. There is some mention that lucene requires Sun Java 1.3 or later, and is thinking about requiring Sun Java 1.4 or later for a future Lucene release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#290454: Manual compile seems to confirm initial error

2005-01-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
Cool. Might be fixed by passing -XssReallyBigNumber which controls the stack size. I think it should be reported to the Kaffe guys... I'm not sure what you should say though... "make the stack bigger by default on power pc" might be good. On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 19:49 -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote: > -

Bug#290454: Manual compile seems to confirm initial error

2005-01-14 Thread Barry Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Attempts to manually (without Ant involvment) compile the same codebase referred to in the initial report resulted in the successful compile of one package and subsequent failure in another. The failure generated a stack trace bearing a strong resembla