On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:10:28AM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
> On Saturday 22 May 2010 14:31:47 Niko Tyni wrote:
> > I expect that fixing the problem will change the ABI, which is something
> > we can't (easily) do for the 5.10.1 series. However, 5.12.1 is only in
> > experimental and ABI changes a
On Saturday 22 May 2010 14:31:47 Niko Tyni wrote:
...
> Does the test program failure depend on /proc/cpu/alignment ?
Not really. Using the default value (0) for /proc/cpu/alignment, the program
will fail with a bad
exit code (the read or write value is not good), but it seems that the
configure
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
> The Configure script is missing the return value of the unaligned access test.
>
> As we can see in the buildd log
> (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=perl;ver=5.10.1-12;arch=armel;stamp=1271034947),
> the build system for pe
Hi all!
The Configure script is missing the return value of the unaligned access test.
As we can see in the buildd log
(https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=perl;ver=5.10.1-12;arch=armel;stamp=1271034947),
the build system for perl thinks ARM can access unaligned data.
But this is *wrong*.
4 matches
Mail list logo