On Sunday 30 May 2010 22:35:49 Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
...
> All my tests indicate that your solution works, so I intend to include
> it in the next upload soon and notify upstream when we've verified the
> bug is actually fixed with the new
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
> Only the -O0 fails... the compiler seems to have optimized away most of our
> test!!!
>
> My proposed solution is to use the 'volatile' keyword to make sure the
> compiler
> will really do the job.
>
> Please note that it does not w
Hi!
I think I've found the (very bad) joke!
I've extracted the code which detect alignment failures into a test/try.c, then
I tried it :
gcc -O0 -Wall -o try try.c && ./try
write failed (efbe)
pooky:~/test# gcc -O -Wall -o try try.c && ./try
pooky:~/test# gcc -O1 -Wall -o try try.c && ./try
3 matches
Mail list logo
