Bug#289466: Identification of problem

2005-01-24 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Attached is a proposed patch which should fix this issue. > > (I included some other simple changes, too) > > > While preparing what was supposed to be a l10n NMU, I went on a few > other simple to fix issues: > > * Lintian

Bug#289466: Identification of problem

2005-01-21 Thread Christian Perrier
> Attached is a proposed patch which should fix this issue. > (I included some other simple changes, too) While preparing what was supposed to be a l10n NMU, I went on a few other simple to fix issues: * Lintian fixes (the obvious ones): - Remove dh-make boilerplate in copyright - Remo

Bug#289466: Identification of problem

2005-01-21 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
tags 289466 patch thanks On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:42:18AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > The viewcvs bug is clearly caused by the use of vhosts in the > configuration file. The script just isn't capable of dealing with > this at all. I think the maintainer script should at least > detect if t

Bug#289466: Identification of problem

2005-01-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 07:46:56AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > After looking at viewcvs config and postinst script, the situation is > > even worse : all settings made by the local admin are always replaced > > by debconf values when upgradin

Bug#289466: Identification of problem

2005-01-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 07:46:56AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > After looking at viewcvs config and postinst script, the situation is > even worse : all settings made by the local admin are always replaced > by debconf values when upgrading. This isn't true. The script tries to read all value