Bug#288554: Processed: your mail

2005-05-23 Thread Eric Dorland
* Brian Ristuccia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:56:38PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > > Is it all that common that firefox will hang when it's grabbed the X > > pointer? > > Yes. The most common hang case is after a newly opened window has first > shown and focus is p

Bug#288554: Processed: your mail

2005-05-10 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:56:38PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > Is it all that common that firefox will hang when it's grabbed the X > pointer? Yes. The most common hang case is after a newly opened window has first shown and focus is put into the title bar / location bar area. Clicking on the

Bug#288554: Processed: your mail

2005-05-10 Thread Eric Dorland
* Brian Ristuccia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:04:31AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > severity 288554 important > > thanks > > > > It's generally considered very rude to just unilaterally upgrade a > > bug's severity with no explanation. Nothing about this bug strikes me

Bug#288554: Processed: your mail

2005-05-06 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:04:31AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > severity 288554 important > thanks > > It's generally considered very rude to just unilaterally upgrade a > bug's severity with no explanation. Nothing about this bug strikes me > as critical. Annoying to be sure, but not critical. Pl

Bug#288554: Processed: your mail

2005-05-04 Thread Eric Dorland
severity 288554 important thanks It's generally considered very rude to just unilaterally upgrade a bug's severity with no explanation. Nothing about this bug strikes me as critical. Annoying to be sure, but not critical. Please explain your reasoning. * Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTEC