Bug#286672: Ping?

2011-08-25 Thread Dan Wallis
As I understand things, there is no longer anything preventing this from being distributed as the developer intended (ie, with TLS/SSL support). What's the hold-up? How can the community help? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#286672: Bug email working?

2011-07-17 Thread Dan Wallis
For some reason I'm not getting email for this bug. Perhaps removing the 'wontfix' tag will help... Oh, and sorry LIU Qi, I should have seen your name at the top of the bug page. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#286672:

2011-07-10 Thread Jeremy Nickurak
Any headway here? Or does nobody use mail-notification anymore? If so, maybe we should get this proposed for removal from the next debian release? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#286672: Mail Notification: OpenSSL+GPL on Debian

2011-06-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:32:18PM +1200, Dan Wallis wrote: > 2011/6/24 Steve Langasek : > > However, in reading the bug log my understanding is the upstream author's > > position is that the GPL does not require dynamically-linked libraries to be > > distributed under the same license terms.  I do

Bug#286672: Mail Notification: OpenSSL+GPL on Debian

2011-06-28 Thread Dan Wallis
2011/6/24 Steve Langasek : > However, in reading the bug log my understanding is the upstream author's > position is that the GPL does not require dynamically-linked libraries to be > distributed under the same license terms.  I don't believe this is an > accurate interpretation of the GPL as writt

Bug#286672: Mail Notification: OpenSSL+GPL on Debian

2011-06-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Thanks for raising this issue. On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:47:56PM +1200, Dan Wallis wrote: > First off, apologies if I'm out of place in sending you this, or if > it's already been discussed here before. I did search the archives > [0], but didn't see any mention of this particular suggestion. >

Bug#286672: ... and with the actual contents of the patch!

2011-03-28 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
Sorry for spamming the bug report with a massive patch. Even sorrier for sending the wrong one! This patch used the magic "-N" flag too and actually contains the code that's required... Rupert add-gnutls-support.patch.gz Description: Binary data pgpXSu4ZvmZsJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#286672: Patch to enable gnutls

2011-03-28 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
As M. Braun said in his previous message (in 2009), there is in fact a patch to enable gnutls support (which he wrote!). I've extracted the code from the massive zip file that's linked at the Ubuntu bug report and have made the required changes to the debian control file to use it. I *think* this

Bug#286672: Patches for gnutls

2009-10-18 Thread M. Braun
Dear package maintainer, please find patches to make mail notification work with gnutls attached to the ubuntu bug report. They apply to the vanilla mail notification 5.4 and introduce only gnutls as a new build and runtime dependeny (no diff for control file included). Sincerely AZ signature

Bug#286672: mail-notification: Please find a consistent solution for all debian packages

2008-10-04 Thread Christian Engwer
Package: mail-notification Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #286672 It seems that different maintainers interpret this issue differently. The FAQ of the openssl package follows the official interpretation of upstream openssl. Several other packages link against libssl although they are

Bug#286672: Status

2006-09-01 Thread Pascal
As a follow up on this, i'm currently looking into patching mail-notification to use GnuTLS instead of OpenSSL. Now, please don't read this as a promise that SSL/TLS support will be back in mail-notification soon. If you're willing to help on this front, you're very much welcome. You can help by:

Bug#286672: Please reconsider SSL support

2006-08-27 Thread Sam Morris
Charles, you have to take it up with upstream. Debian simply does not have permission to distribute binaries of mail-notification compiled with OpenSSL support. Another alternative would be to port mail-notification to use the Gnu TLS library... :) -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id

Bug#286672: Please reconsider SSL support

2006-07-24 Thread Charles Griffin
If there is any way to provide SSL support for this package, I would be very grateful.  I understand there may be some licensing issues but I think upstream should reconsider.  Not having SSL support renders this application useless for me. Thank you.

Bug#286672: mail-notification: Can't use SSL/TLS

2005-08-15 Thread Chun-Chung Chen
Since the author explicitly expressed that the program can be distributed with dynamically linked OpenSSL. Why not just use the email from the author as a permission statement and include it in the documentation? -- Chun-Chung Chen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject