On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:41:20PM -0500, Raphael wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about this, but I think DD's won't like upgrade stuff
> from a package that never existed in the Debian rep to a new coming
> one.
That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Specially if there has been a
debian package around
On 18/06/07, Hendrik Frenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raphael schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> On 18/06/07, Hendrik Frenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the plans are to provide the debian/ scripts from upstream; and
> > of course making any require
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raphael schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> On 18/06/07, Hendrik Frenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the plans are to provide the debian/ scripts from upstream; and
> > of course making any required change to ispCP so there's no need of
> > applying any p
Hello,
On 18/06/07, Hendrik Frenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
i'm currently working at the ispcp packages, so there is no need to restart the
packaging.
The packages builds lintian clean at the moment and installs the files a bit
FHS conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
i'm currently working at the ispcp packages, so there is no need to restart the
packaging.
The packages builds lintian clean at the moment and installs the files a bit
FHS conform.
Now i'm starting convert the config and {pre,post}{ins,rm} of
Hello,
I would like to notify that upstream (including me) has plans to
create it's Debian package.
I've already identified some changes that need to be made so it can be
packaged without patching anything.
Please see: http://www.isp-control.net/ispcp/ticket/394
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avo
6 matches
Mail list logo
