Bug#282468: subversion: second

2005-04-26 Thread John McCutchan
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:00 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * John McCutchan: > > > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't > >> you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that > >> t

Bug#282468: subversion: second

2005-04-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* John McCutchan: > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't >> you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that >> the umask doesn't matter? > > The proper umask is 002. Even if adduse

Bug#282468: subversion: second

2005-04-25 Thread John McCutchan
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't > you use the FSFS backend and set proper repository permissions so that > the umask doesn't matter? The proper umask is 002. That might not work for EVERYONE, but for

Bug#282468: subversion: second

2005-04-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* John McCutchan: > This really needs to be done. It is a huge pain, and everytime the > packages get updated, I have to re-fix this. Please convert all svn > binaries to wrapper scripts that set the proper umask. What is the proper umask? It's different for different people. Can't you use the

Bug#282468: subversion: second

2005-04-24 Thread John McCutchan
Package: subversion Version: 1.1.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #282468 This really needs to be done. It is a huge pain, and everytime the packages get updated, I have to re-fix this. Please convert all svn binaries to wrapper scripts that set the proper umask. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1