On 2005-09-28 18:16:21 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> All advices I've gathered up to now around me tend to mention that
> having same names for groups with different GIDs in different
> databases is a completely strange idea
Here it was the *same* GID. This is a good idea
* to avoid clashes
tags 282184 wontfix
thanks
> I don't think so. getent may use remote databases, whereas groupadd
> is purely local (according to the man page).
>
> And some packages use it to create local groups.
All advices I've gathered up to now around me tend to mention that
having same names for groups wi
2 matches
Mail list logo
