Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:13:01PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>> Hehe :-) (Using the kernel provided by Debian would mean wasting
>> 2GB of memory on my machine.)
>
> So you are using a 64bit kernel, or is there anything else in
> particular you have
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:13:01PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:37:50PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >> It's a via-pmu:
> >
> > Ok, so where is the problem ? The /dev/pmu stuff would be accessible
> > in acme/contr
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:37:50PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>> It's a via-pmu:
>
> Ok, so where is the problem ? The /dev/pmu stuff would be accessible
> in acme/control-center/whatever-it-is, nd everyone will be happy ?
> Unless you are telling me
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:37:50PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:37:59PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >>
> >>> As you see, the crux of this patch is to check for the existence
> >>> of a via-pmu device in the firmwar
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:37:59PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>>
>>> As you see, the crux of this patch is to check for the existence
>>> of a via-pmu device in the firmware provided device-tree.
>>
>> This isn't really good enough. My machine (G5) h
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:37:59PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> > As you see, the crux of this patch is to check for the existence of
> > a via-pmu device in the firmware provided device-tree.
>
> This isn't really good enough. My machine (G5) has a PMU, it's in the
Ah, yes. Is it a via-
> As you see, the crux of this patch is to check for the existence of
> a via-pmu device in the firmware provided device-tree.
This isn't really good enough. My machine (G5) has a PMU, it's in the
device-tree and /proc/pmu exists too. But it does not have
/dev/pmu[1]. You only get /dev/pmu the
Hello, please find here attached two files :
1) pmu_fix.patch : a new version of the 08 patch, with the change attached,
take it with a grain of salt since i had hunk offset when applying 08 alone.
2) pmu_fix.diff : the diff between the old version and the new one.
As you see, the crux of
8 matches
Mail list logo
