On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:12:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Given the recent freeze announcement, I'd suggest that regardless of
> > what other fixes are made, a good first step would be to get a fixed
> > doc-base (i.e. one that works with the current stable perl-base only)
> > package into
# let's have this on both
reassign 279232 perl,doc-base
thanks
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:25:06PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> >it could be "fixed" by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
> >perl-modules on perl-base while let
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:25:06PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> >it could be "fixed" by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
> >perl-modules on perl-base while letting perl-base conflict with too old
> >perl-modules, which forces apt to update both packages together; this
> >combination may
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
>it could be "fixed" by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
>perl-modules on perl-base while letting perl-base conflict with too old
>perl-modules, which forces apt to update both packages together; this
>combination may be highl
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> > Moin,
> > bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
> > problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> Moin,
> bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
> problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
> woody to sarge.
> what do you think about the solution (using pre-dep
6 matches
Mail list logo
