Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > BTW, I can find advi.sty in ADVI, but I do not seem to be able to find > > adviedit.sty; is it whizzedit.sty in the examples dir you mention? > > Sorry, it adviedit.sty is not need, it is only the command \adviedit > of the file advi.sty that is needed. > > Files advi-annot.sty and bu

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Didier Remy
> BTW, I can find advi.sty in ADVI, but I do not seem to be able to find > adviedit.sty; is it whizzedit.sty in the examples dir you mention? Sorry, it adviedit.sty is not need, it is only the command \adviedit of the file advi.sty that is needed. Files advi-annot.sty and bubble.sty are also r

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi Didier Thanks for your response. > (Thinking about it, it is kind of stupid not to make the documentation > sources available. ---I think I did not do it to avoid too many > dependencies.) > > I make a new version 1.2.2 with the source documentation added. It requires > ActiveDvi because I

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Didier Remy
> > I can of course release the source of the documentation. > > I was just not aware of the problem. I let you know when it is done. > > Thanks for your consideration. > > There has been a lot of debate going on even within Debian on > whether to handle 'documentation' different from 'software

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > It would be nice if you could provide the source to the > > documentation along with the generated documentation. > > > > Apologies if it's just an oversight on my part. > > I can of course release the source of the documentation. > I was just not aware of the problem. I let you know wh

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-04 Thread Didier Remy
> I've checked out 1.2.1 source tarball, and noticed that > latex source to documentation in doc/ dir is replaced with > ps/html/dvi/pdf/info documentation. > > This qualifies the documentation as non-free in Debian terms; > and I will be forced to split the package into non-free > documentatio

Bug#276196: whizzytex does not contain source to documentation

2005-03-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've checked out 1.2.1 source tarball, and noticed that latex source to documentation in doc/ dir is replaced with ps/html/dvi/pdf/info documentation. This qualifies the documentation as non-free in Debian terms; and I will be forced to split the package into non-free documentation package