Bug#272004: This bug doesn't appear to be happening

2006-02-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
close 272004 0.3.0-2 thanks * Steve Langasek [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:13:48 -0800]: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:16:18AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > This is a very old bug, and it applies to a version in experimental which > > has > > been superseded by the version in unstable, and the versi

Bug#272004:

2006-01-23 Thread Regis Boudin
Hi, Looking at the changelog and versions history, it looks like libtunepimp 0.3.0-test2-1 was actually a mis-numbered pre-0.3.0 snapshot, which was expected to be superseded by 0.3.0-1. Therefore, I suggest to remove the version from experimental and close this bug. HTH, Regis -- "While a monk

Bug#272004: This bug doesn't appear to be happening

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:16:18AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > This is a very old bug, and it applies to a version in experimental which has > been superseded by the version in unstable, and the version in unstable build > just fine. > So why is this bug open? > Reply to bug trail please.

Bug#272004: This bug doesn't appear to be happening

2006-01-05 Thread Nathanael Nerode
This is a very old bug, and it applies to a version in experimental which has been superseded by the version in unstable, and the version in unstable build just fine. So why is this bug open? Reply to bug trail please. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Insert famous quote here] --

Bug#272004: Bug #272004 assigned to wrong dists

2005-10-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: normal #272004 has as only version 0.3.0-test2-1 registered which is higher than the version number in unstable (probably not intentionally but by maintainer's fault, but anyway). So it really should only apply to experimental. But the BTS seems to assume that th