Hi David
Attached is an svn diff containing updated javahl patches.
These patches enabled me to build 1.2.1 on sarge (i368).
Please consider enabling javahl.
Thanks.
Andrew V.
Index: debian/patches/kaffe-javah.patch
===
--- debian
Any progress on this bug?
I succeeded to get javahl built using gcj-4.0. There were some patches
for g++-4.0 needed, but the package gets built with free java tools.
Attached the debdiff to my source package. Please integrate this in the
next revision of the subversion package.
--
Reinhard Tart
Hi David,
Wolfgang Baer contributed the 2 attached patches in reply to a query on
debian-java.
They allow the current version of Kaffe to build javahl.
Please consider adding them to the next upload of Subversion.
(They also apply to 1.1.4).
I will be forwarding them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
I just compiled Subversion with JavaHL with Kaffe. The compile worked
fine and the package is fine.
This should be enabled by default at this point. Can we get this please?
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
> actually, I never enabled libsvn-javahl. to build you need to enable
> it in debian/rules, and regenerate debian/control. I'll probably
> enable it in the next upload on archs where it can work if all goas
> according to plan.
great news -- thanks a lot!
Cheers
Carsten Pfeiffer
--
To
hi,
actually, I never enabled libsvn-javahl. to build you need to enable
it in debian/rules, and regenerate debian/control. I'll probably
enable it in the next upload on archs where it can work if all goas
according to plan.
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: subversion
Version: 1.1.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #271125
Hi,
Version 1.1.3 of the subversion source no longer generates
libsvn-javahl.
The command sequence is:
$ apt-get source subversion
$ cd subversion-1.1.3
$ fakeroot ./debian/rules binary
after some time...
$ cd ..
$ ls
libapache2
On 27 Dec 2004 17:00:06 +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is it possible that a patch could be written to allow javahl to be built
> > with kaffe?
>
> Certainly it's possible. But the more relevant questions are the size
> of the patch and who's going to write it.
I'd be willing to provide a pat
8 matches
Mail list logo