On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote:
> They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make
> their build system and
> everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing
> it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, whic
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote:
> They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make
> their build system and
> everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing
> it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, whic
* Nick Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +, Thom May wrote:
> > I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors
> > have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absolutely think
> > that the apache2 package should not co
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +, Thom May wrote:
> I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors
> have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absolutely think
> that the apache2 package should not contain any major components that aren't
> included i
* Nick Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> What are your thoughts on integrating this functionality into the main
> unstable/experimental tree?
>
> Thank you,
>
I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors
have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absol
5 matches
Mail list logo
