Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread marius popa
Damyan Ivanov wrote: Short story: I think that this is unexploitable. I think we could hunt this kind of bugs with code checkers (like flawfinder) gds.cpp:960: [4] (buffer) strcpy: Does not check for buffer overflows when copying to destination. Consider using strncpy or strlcpy (warning,

Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread Damyan Ivanov
tags 264453 - security tags 264453 + fixed-upstream thanks Florian Weimer wrote: > * Damyan Ivanov: > >>If you have no objections, I intent to close the bugreport. Ot should it be >>tagged "wontfix" and security tag removed? > > Either way is fine with me. If the underlying problem -- passing >

Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread Florian Weimer
* Damyan Ivanov: > If you have no objections, I intent to close the bugreport. Ot should it be > tagged "wontfix" and security tag removed? Either way is fine with me. If the underlying problem -- passing around buffer addresses without the corresponding length -- is tracked somewhere else (mayb

Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Short story: I think that this is unexploitable. Florian Weimer wrote: > * Damyan Ivanov: > > >> So I decided to check whether fb_lock_mgr actually uses this source. It >> seems to be linked with jrd statically. (From what I see in the makefile >> spaghetti) > > > This is only a problem if i

Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread Florian Weimer
* Damyan Ivanov: > So I decided to check whether fb_lock_mgr actually uses this source. It seems > to be linked with jrd statically. (From what I see in the makefile spaghetti) This is only a problem if it also invokes setlocale, to activate the localized message files. > So, what is the code, t

Bug#264453: [Pkg-firebird-general] Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-31 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Florian Weimer wrote: > I agree that this is a horrible coding style, but it's unlikely that > it's exploitable. As far as I can tell, the situation is follows: Thank you very much for looking at this bug. I agree with your reasoning. However, there is a possibility for the local admin to give f

Bug#264453: Very likely not exploitable

2005-10-30 Thread Florian Weimer
I agree that this is a horrible coding style, but it's unlikely that it's exploitable. As far as I can tell, the situation is follows: * An attacker must change the system's error messages. * This is only possible by setting LC_MESSAGES to a specially crafted locale file. * This in tu