Bug#260256: libsigc++: ping on #260256

2007-04-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/04/2007): > Sure, an NMU is fine (I thoguht I was on the low-threshold list?). > I probably just figured this bug was fixed and forgot that it was > re-opened. Alright, thanks! Since kfreebsd-* are not official ports right now, I don't really consider t

Bug#260256: libsigc++: ping on #260256

2007-04-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:21:37AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > is there any reason preventing the patch for #260256 to get applied? It > was reported a while back and we haven't been receiving any answer for > 1.5+ year. What would you think of a porter NMU? (Sin

Bug#260256: libsigc++: ping on #260256

2007-03-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, is there any reason preventing the patch for #260256 to get applied? It was reported a while back and we haven't been receiving any answer for 1.5+ year. What would you think of a porter NMU? (Since I understand fully that you might be busy on something else.) Thanks in advance. Cheers, --