On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:17:51AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > The solution we discussed was to find a test that can tell us what
> > binaries are "ocamlc -custom" executable. If we can find them, we can
> > warn packager t
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> The solution we discussed was to find a test that can tell us what
> binaries are "ocamlc -custom" executable. If we can find them, we can
> warn packager that it should be rebuild without the deprecated option.
> To detect these fi
Le Thursday 21 August 2008 04:00:40 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
> correct
> me if I am wrong:
> * When linking against an ocaml module, the .cmo file is needed. This is
> clearly not the case in a majority of ocaml packages, if not all of them.
> * When using the .cma file, compilation is mad
Le Monday 18 August 2008 17:46:50 Xavier Leroy, vous avez écrit :
> First, the bug summary is incorrect: it's not all ocaml-generated
> executables that cannot be stripped, but only those generated by the
> now-obsolete "ocamlc -custom" option. The latter builds a mixed
> bytecode/native C executa
Le Wednesday 20 August 2008 17:54:41 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
> > (The last digit of the magic number changed during the life of OCaml,
> > but it's been "8" since June 2004, and I don't expect it to change any
> > time soon. If you want to play it safe, recognize the regexp
> > "Caml1999
Le Wednesday 20 August 2008 17:10:06 Xavier Leroy, vous avez écrit :
> Hello Sylvain,
>
> > The solution we discussed was to find a test that can tell us what
> > binaries are "ocamlc -custom" executable. If we can find them, we can
> > warn packager that it should be rebuild without the deprecated
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
>
> Hello Sven,
>
> >>> 1- "ocamlc -custom" is deprecated and packages that use it should be
> >>> fixed.
> >>>
> >> If this option is deprecated, i think we should handle it so for all
> >> debian package. See at the end of the mail
Hello Sven,
>>> 1- "ocamlc -custom" is deprecated and packages that use it should be fixed.
>>>
>> If this option is deprecated, i think we should handle it so for all
>> debian package. See at the end of the mail for a proposed way of doing
>> thing.
>
> One question though which comes to mind w
Hello Sylvain,
> The solution we discussed was to find a test that can tell us what
> binaries are "ocamlc -custom" executable. If we can find them, we can
> warn packager that it should be rebuild without the deprecated option.
> To detect these files we must have a very simple script, lets call
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > > First, a few reminders:
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256900
> > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/200
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > First, a few reminders:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256900
> > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/07/181268104b59b10ed1624cb92ed996c4.fr.html
> >
> > Is there any news on this i
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> 2- If this isn't practical, it's not a big deal that a couple of
>executables cannot be stripped. Other packagers (e.g. RedHat and
>Mandriva) have had no problems in the past turning stripping off on
>a case-by-case basis.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> First, the bug summary is incorrect: it's not all ocaml-generated
> executables that cannot be stripped, but only those generated by the
> now-obsolete "ocamlc -custom" option. The latter builds a mixed
> bytecode/native C executable,
> First, a few reminders:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256900
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/07/181268104b59b10ed1624cb92ed996c4.fr.html
>
> Is there any news on this issue? It seems it is still on topic in OCaml
> 3.10.2...
First, the bug summary i
Hello,
First, a few reminders:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256900
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/07/181268104b59b10ed1624cb92ed996c4.fr.html
Is there any news on this issue? It seems it is still on topic in OCaml
3.10.2...
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> Rather t
15 matches
Mail list logo