Bug#254520: NMU

2005-12-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, mlang, le Thu 01 Dec 2005 13:52:36 +0100, a écrit : > I am well aware of this, my point was merely that it is questionable > (to me) how necessary it is to get something into testing, which is > already obsolete. Isn't speakup used? Regards, Samuel

Bug#254520: NMU

2005-12-01 Thread mlang
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Mario Lang, le Wed 30 Nov 2005 09:28:35 +0100, a écrit : >> Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to >> > have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if y

Bug#254520: NMU

2005-11-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Mario Lang, le Wed 30 Nov 2005 09:28:35 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to > > have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to > > do so. > > No problem with me,

Bug#254520: NMU

2005-11-30 Thread Mario Lang
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to > have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to > do so. No problem with me, if you really think working on speakup 2.4 is worth it... -- CYa,

Bug#254520: NMU

2005-11-29 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to do so. Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]