Bug#254089: FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken

2005-12-16 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: mtr Version: 0.58-1.0.0.1.pure64 Followup-For: Bug #254089 I just noticed (thanks to debsecan) that because of this bug, I still have an old, patched version of mtr that's vulnerable to CVE-2004-1224. Anyway, if you don't want to hardcode -lresolv, my suggestion would be to adjust the tes

Bug#254089: FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken

2005-07-14 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:35:29AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hallo Goswin and Robert > > Attached you will find a set of possible patches for this problem. > I tested them on my amd64 and mtr works well. > > Please apply *only one* of them, depending on whether you like to > patch configu

Bug#254089: FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken

2005-07-13 Thread Christian Hammers
Hallo Goswin and Robert Attached you will find a set of possible patches for this problem. I tested them on my amd64 and mtr works well. Please apply *only one* of them, depending on whether you like to patch configure.in and run autoreconf or apply the larger one to configure and be done. Both

Bug#254089: FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken

2005-03-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, Is there a reason the patch wasn't applied in the 0.69-1 version? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254089: FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken

2005-02-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I was using autoconf 2.59 instead of 2.13, and probably a more recent version of automake too since 1.5 isn't available in Debian. The attached patch works using autoconf2.13. Kurt --- configure.in.orig 2004-12-12 17:45:24.0 +0100 +++ configure.in2005-02-03 20:51:59.4664