Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just plain lseek will do. With _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 that is all you
>> need. I don't see the point of using the lseek64 alias.
>
> I don't know much about that. My experience told me
> that
Hi.
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just plain lseek will do. With _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 that is all you
> need. I don't see the point of using the lseek64 alias.
I don't know much about that. My experience told me
that libc5 system had llseek, but glibc system don't.
And _ll
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It should not use _llseek on i386 either. The right way is to define
>> 64bit file operations (LFS) and use the normal lseek (which then uses
>> 64bit off_t).
>
> Maybe. I'll consult it with the upstream later.
>
> # When the extipl began to use __lls
Hi. Thank you for your attention.
with "Re: Bug#250086: extipl: please add amd64 support",
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache show extipl
> Package: extipl
> Version: 5.04-1.0.0.1.pure64
> Filename:
> po
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (This mail is copied to amd64 list)
>
> Hi. I'm now working on that package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache show extipl
Package: extipl
Version: 5.04-1.0.0.1.pure64
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Maintainer: Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archit
(This mail is copied to amd64 list)
Hi. I'm now working on that package.
> > I don't know about amd64. Does extipl fully work on that arch ?
> > Your patch seems just to replace "i386" with "amd64 i386" on
> > the Architecture field in control file. Is it enough to use
> > extipl on amd64 ? ext
6 matches
Mail list logo
