Bug#249873: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#249873: Patch

2012-04-24 Thread Nikolaus Rath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/24/2012 12:39 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org): > >> Hmm. I think defaulting to /etc/samba/private now, only to have >> another transition once we've convinced upstream to comply with >> FHS is inviting tr

Bug#249873: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#249873: Patch

2012-04-24 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org): > Hmm. I think defaulting to /etc/samba/private now, only to have another > transition once we've convinced upstream to comply with FHS is inviting > trouble. > > If we have to obey FHS, wouldn't it be much easier to just replace > fhs-filespaths.patch w

Bug#249873: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#249873: Patch

2012-04-24 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/24/2012 12:42 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> >> If think the proper solution is to drop the fhs-filespaths.patch and >> make "private dir" default to upstreams layout, both in the installed >> smb.conf and in the binary. > > Yes. However, if we could avoid adding something to smb.conf, it w

Bug#249873: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#249873: Patch

2012-04-24 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org): > Hi, > > I'd like to help fix this, but I'm not quite sure what kind of patch > you'd like to see here. Thanks for your offer. I was planning to try fixing that bug myself as I'm hit by it on some servers of mine (which I would like to set as domain con

Bug#249873: Patch

2012-04-23 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Hi, I'd like to help fix this, but I'm not quite sure what kind of patch you'd like to see here. If think the proper solution is to drop the fhs-filespaths.patch and make "private dir" default to upstreams layout, both in the installed smb.conf and in the binary. For migration, there would be a