Bug#249157:

2006-09-12 Thread Viktor Horvath
Would be great if audacity could be built with portaudio-v19 by default, when that's mature enough. Apparently, one gets nice JACK support by it - that's what attracts me :-) Best wishes, Viktor. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#249157: Re: Re: Bug#249157: audacity: Should be built with ALSA support

2006-03-05 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:57:01PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > And, additionally, it looks like that the Debian package is > sufficiently broken so that it doesn't compile with > --with-portaudio=v19: This can be worked around by running autoreconf in lib-src/portaudio-v19. The ./configure script i

Bug#249157: Re: Re: Bug#249157: audacity: Should be built with ALSA support

2005-05-30 Thread Marc Haber
> Well, for example, recording from the digital input of my Zoltrix > Nightingale Pro 6 doesn't work at all without ALSA support compiled > into audacity. And, additionally, it looks like that the Debian package is sufficiently broken so that it doesn't compile with --with-portaudio=v19: Type 'ma

Bug#249157: Re: Bug#249157: audacity: Should be built with ALSA support

2005-05-29 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:12:45AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: > Unfortunately, compiling with portaudio-v19 enabled would break things > for many users. Audacity's portaudio-v19 support is experimental and > incomplete. PortAudio v19 is only available as a development snapshot, > and at the momen