On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there any progress on this? Did you send that patch to define
> >HAVE_ALLOCA upstream? I really think that that is all that is
> >missing to get a working version.
>
> Up
Quoting Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Is there any progress on this? Did you send that patch to define
HAVE_ALLOCA upstream? I really think that that is all that is
missing to get a working version.
Upstream didn't reply. There is no such HAVE_ALLOCA in the upstream
code for amd64, because
Hi,
Is there any progress on this? Did you send that patch to define
HAVE_ALLOCA upstream? I really think that that is all that is
missing to get a working version.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:00:45PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > It seems to have 1 important change over the last amdx86-64.h you
> > send:
> >
> > +/* Define C_ALLOCA if this machine does not support a true alloca
> > + and the one written in C should be used instead.
> > + Define HAVE_
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I can confirm that the patch on:
> http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/patches/emacs21_21.3+1-7.0.0.1.amd64.patch
>
> builds fine on amd64.
>
> It seems to have 1 important change over the last amdx86-64.h you
> send:
>
> +/* Define C
Hi,
I can confirm that the patch on:
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/patches/emacs21_21.3+1-7.0.0.1.amd64.patch
builds fine on amd64.
It seems to have 1 important change over the last amdx86-64.h you
send:
+/* Define C_ALLOCA if this machine does not support a true alloca
+ and
6 matches
Mail list logo
