On Thursday, October 13, 2005 at 19:11:56, Peter S. Galbraith wrote:
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, October 13, 2005 at 16:14:06, Peter S. Galbraith wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Your file vm-rfaddons.el has been suggested as an add-on to the
> > > Debian packa
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 13, 2005 at 16:14:06, Peter S. Galbraith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your file vm-rfaddons.el has been suggested as an add-on to the
> > Debian package emacs-goodies-el. See http://bugs.debian.org/24
> > for the archive of the
On Friday, October 14, 2005 at 00:00:11, Robert Widhopf wrote:
[...]
> Do you mean that they will not compile without VM, or are
> you referring to something else? Compiling without VM is
> dangerous due to VM macros which then will not be expanded
> correctly.
The macro problem would not be ther
On Thursday, October 13, 2005 at 16:14:06, Peter S. Galbraith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your file vm-rfaddons.el has been suggested as an add-on to the
> Debian package emacs-goodies-el. See http://bugs.debian.org/24
> for the archive of the discussion including this message (sent to
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
Your file vm-rfaddons.el has been suggested as an add-on to the Debian
package emacs-goodies-el. See http://bugs.debian.org/24 for the
archive of the discussion including this message (sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file seems to have a bunch of undeclared dependencies on VM for
byte-co
5 matches
Mail list logo