Control: tag -1 pending
Stop
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 01:19:06PM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> I note that this is marked as wontfix and that the current radvd package
> uses namespaces to isolate the filesystem, which will achieve what the
> proposed chroot would have set out to do.
>
> Therefore
I note that this is marked as wontfix and that the current radvd package
uses namespaces to isolate the filesystem, which will achieve what the
proposed chroot would have set out to do.
Therefore could we close this bug now to reduce SnR in the BTS?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Erno Kuusela wrote:
| [0]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch-sec-services.en.html#s-chroot
|
| There are tools in Debian however, that make it easier to set up
| chroots, such as jailer or jailtool.
you have to separate between packages setting up chroo
hello,
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
|
| severity 242472 wishlist
| retitle 242472 Please chroot radvd
| tags 242472 + wontfix
| thanks
|
| I just wanted to note that Debian packages do not set up chroots in
| general, as also noted in the Securing Debian Manual[0]:
|
| ,
|
severity 242472 wishlist
retitle 242472 Please chroot radvd
tags 242472 + wontfix
thanks
I just wanted to note that Debian packages do not set up chroots in
general, as also noted in the Securing Debian Manual[0]:
,
| The daemons that you install with your Debian distribution will not
| come
5 matches
Mail list logo
