Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:38:35PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>> I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
>> http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
>> subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decid
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:38:35PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
> http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
> subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decide
> whether to drop ev4 or ev56 support.
Hi,
I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decide
whether to drop ev4 or ev56 support. The objections were:
* Subarchitecture information should come from anoth
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Falk Hueffner]
>> So I suggest something like the following patch. It only determines
>> this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get it for
>> other architectures, and in particular, which categories would be
>> relevant. Opinions?
>
[Falk Hueffner]
> So I suggest something like the following patch. It only determines
> this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get it for
> other architectures, and in particular, which categories would be
> relevant. Opinions?
Thank you for the patch. But I do not want to teach th
Hi,
to decide what subarchitectures should be supported in future
releases, it would really be helpful to see which are in current
use. So I suggest something like the following patch. It only
determines this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get
it for other architectures, and in p
6 matches
Mail list logo
