> Hmm, this is completely backwards; somehow the original NKI linting patch
> has been forgotten; all that made it here is commentary on the one
> part of it that no-one wanted applied. So, the real question is, should I
> be applying the rest of his patch? Note that it's adding an NKI. Also note
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Neale Pickett wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote:
>> - "A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing.",
>> + "A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing.",
>>
>> Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should
>> not, be r
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:40:49PM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> > - "A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing.",
> > + "A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing.",
> >
> > Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun,
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> - "A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing.",
> + "A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing.",
>
> Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should
> not, be removed?
Good point. I'll take this up with the h
- "A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing.",
+ "A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing.",
Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should
not, be removed?
--
see, shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
5 matches
Mail list logo
