Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why do you want to stop it at the end of runlevel S, instead of
> stopping it at the start of runlevel 1 (single user)? I would suspect
> adding for example 1:K99bootlogd would solve this problem, as it would
> stop bootlogd just before starting S20single.
On boot int
[Thomas Hood]
> At the end of the initscript sequence for runlevel S we need to know
> whether or not we are going to switch to a multi-user runlevel (2
> through 5). (If we are not going to switch to a multi-user runlevel
> then we must stop bootlogd; otherwise we leave bootlogd running and
> it
Thomas Hood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I propose to fix this bug by adding a script at S:S99 that stops bootlogd
> if the system is being booted with the "single" parameter. Anyone see any
> problem with this idea?
There are other "aliases" for single, such as "1". Some people might
come up i
I propose to fix this bug by adding a script at S:S99 that stops bootlogd
if the system is being booted with the "single" parameter. Anyone see any
problem with this idea?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
4 matches
Mail list logo
