Bug#205702: lesspipe: Please consider using a more powerful version

2023-08-07 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. Just for the records: I've filed an RFP[0] for the lesspipe alternative from: https://github.com/wofr06/lesspipe respectively https://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~friebel/unix/lesspipe.html which, AFAICS, is also the one used in gentoo. Should it get packaged, than maybe both could simply happi

Bug#205702:

2014-09-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2014-09-24 21:10:11 -0300, Raphaël Droz wrote: > I had a quick look at Friebel's version. Indeed it implements the > above requested features. Anyway, I found it much less readable that > Gentoo's version. I agree that it isn't much readable. Well, not that exactly. The main problem is that it

Bug#205702:

2014-09-24 Thread Raphaël Droz
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 01:02:27AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2014-09-24 18:01:04 -0300, Raphaël Droz wrote: > > The Gentoo version of lesspipe¹ is vastly superior: > > > > It supports files inside archive, archive compression detection > > (all these .(sh|txt|log|...).gz + compressed manp

Bug#205702:

2014-09-24 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2014-09-24 18:01:04 -0300, Raphaël Droz wrote: > The Gentoo version of lesspipe¹ is vastly superior: > > It supports files inside archive, archive compression detection > (all these .(sh|txt|log|...).gz + compressed manpages and other > files commonly compressed in /usr/share/, ...) Friebel's

Bug#205702:

2014-09-24 Thread Raphaël Droz
The Gentoo version of lesspipe¹ is vastly superior: It supports files inside archive, archive compression detection (all these .(sh|txt|log|...).gz + compressed manpages and other files commonly compressed in /usr/share/, ...) and, most of all, filetype detection through `file` in case no extensio

Bug#205702: Código aviso: ID67565434

2012-10-12 Thread Webmail equipe de atualização
Caro Webmail / Conta de Usuário E-mail, Esta é para informá-lo que a sua conta de webmail foram listadas entre as conta dose que será suspenso, devido ao ato suspeito que tenha sido realizada por sua conta de webmail. Você foi advertido em diversas ocasiões para validar / actualizar a sua conta,

Bug#205702:

2011-08-16 Thread Vincent Lefevre
I'm not the OP, but... On 2006-10-11 17:22:55 +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote: > So, you know of a tool like catdoc for OpenOffice files? There's my script sxw2txt (based on Liam Morland's), included in Wolfgang Friebel's lesspipe. > Please define "full featured". Charset conversion, archive suppor

Bug#205702: Please use a lesspipe that understand file types.

2008-02-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: less Version: 418-1 Followup-For: Bug #205702 Dear Anìbal, the current lesspipe file is used in Debian only; other distributions seem to use alternatives such as the one suggested at the beginning of this bug report, or the following one (for Fink): http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~friebel

Bug#205702:

2006-10-10 Thread Felipe Massia Pereira
Sorry guys, but it's just too strange that less understands Office doc files with catdoc and does not understand OpenOffice sxw/ods. Why not use full featured lesspipe or at least leave it as an option to the user? What about a second package? About updating profile, don't kill me, but env-update i

Bug#205702: less: provide text preprocessors as an option for users

2006-07-28 Thread t takahashi
thanks for your reply. clearly you don't want text preprocessors for yourself. but why not provide the most common ones for those who want it? i don't think they will ask you to make it default. instead they will be grateful for saving them the debugging. man using less does not work because

Bug#205702: less: provide text preprocessors as an option for users

2006-07-18 Thread Thomas Schoepf
- Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:27:19 -0700 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Betreff: Bug#205702: less: provide text preprocessors as an option for users > Package: less > Version: 394-2 > Followup-For: Bug #205702 &g

Bug#205702: less: provide text preprocessors as an option for users

2006-06-22 Thread gambarimasu+reportbug
Package: less Version: 394-2 Followup-For: Bug #205702 it would be nice if you could provide the text preprocessors, such as for man pages, as an option, perhaps as a separate script. it is not trivial for users to figure out how to process man pages to work with less. recently, my setup which