On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:51:23PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:55:49AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > There's the argument that a normal system should have all or nothing
> > of the upstream perl distribution installed. Although we're sort of
> > violating that alrea
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:55:49AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:11:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:47:49AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:51:57PM -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> > > > Package: perl-modules
> > > >
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:11:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:47:49AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:51:57PM -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> > > Package: perl-modules
> > > Version: 5.8.0-17
> > >
> > > When perl-modules is installed but li
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:47:49AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:51:57PM -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> > Package: perl-modules
> > Version: 5.8.0-17
> >
> > When perl-modules is installed but libperl-dev is not, ExtUtils::Embed
> > incorrectly reports -lperl to be available
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:51:57PM -0600, Stephen Waters wrote:
> Package: perl-modules
> Version: 5.8.0-17
>
> When perl-modules is installed but libperl-dev is not, ExtUtils::Embed
> incorrectly reports -lperl to be available.
> If
>
> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
> and
> perl -MExtUtils::
5 matches
Mail list logo