Bug#183871: sfs on ppc

2005-06-02 Thread Jaakko Niemi
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, the Edward Blevins wrote: > > Make sure you give both, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. I just tested, > > the problem and workaround are there, on current sid and > > gcc version there. > > Yes. I got this work around to work. Thanks a bunch. Would it be > possible to add a check for

Bug#183871: sfs on ppc

2005-06-02 Thread the Edward Blevins
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:55:23PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > On Mon, 07 Feb 2005, the Edward Blevins wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > > >This seems to be gcc issue. If you build it with -O0, it will > > >work. If you have bit of time, please try -O1 and -O also, so > > >we

Bug#183871: sfs on ppc

2005-05-04 Thread Jaakko Niemi
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005, the Edward Blevins wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > >This seems to be gcc issue. If you build it with -O0, it will > >work. If you have bit of time, please try -O1 and -O also, so > >we can even see what the optimization level is that brings > >trouble. >

Bug#183871: sfs on ppc

2005-02-07 Thread the Edward Blevins
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Jaakko Niemi wrote: >This seems to be gcc issue. If you build it with -O0, it will >work. If you have bit of time, please try -O1 and -O also, so >we can even see what the optimization level is that brings >trouble. I am still having this exact same problem with version 1:0.