Control: tag 181123 pending
Andreas Henriksson writes:
> These patches is an attempt to finally put #181123 to rest.
> It tries to strike a well balanced middle ground between existing
> debian state of the archive and the LSB. The main focus has been
> to atleast mention the actions where prev
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 04:09:31 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> These patches is an attempt to finally put #181123 to rest.
>
> It tries to strike a well balanced middle ground between existing
> debian state of the archive and the LSB. The main focus has been
> to atleast mention the actions where
On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 at 04:09:31 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Andreas Henriksson (2):
> Document optional try-restart init script action
> Document status init script action
Both patches seconded. There is of course plenty more to be done
in this chapter, but let's not let the perfect be
Seconded both Andreas Henriksson patches.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Email: on...@debian.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
In LSB the status action is among the 'shall be supported' actions.
In Debian there are still many init scripts which does not support
the status action still to this day (see lintian catches for
init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status).
Given we avoid creating a big number of RC b
These patches is an attempt to finally put #181123 to rest.
It tries to strike a well balanced middle ground between existing
debian state of the archive and the LSB. The main focus has been
to atleast mention the actions where previously left out of policy
while being documented in LSB.
This ent
Add the try-restart action similar to how LSB describes it.
Many init scripts in Debian still does not support this action
but fortunately even LSB just documents it as optional.
Fwiw, systemctl also supports try-restart action in the same fashion.
---
policy.sgml | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 in
7 matches
Mail list logo
