Hello Kari,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:29:05PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> I will run with this patch, and will inform you if I find any side effect.
So, I ran with your patch.
I experienced a failure (well, at least a behavior change; I've not
investigated deeply; maybe it's a bug in th
Hello Kari,
I tried your patch sent to #170825.
I think it deals with 217862 and 270545.
I'm not sure it fixes 20471 (I'm not sure I tried the right sequence).
And it does not deal with the use case described at the beginning of
#170825.
170825 is about a virtual package:
A_1 Provides: A-1
A_2
For simplicity I'll call the package to be configured with A.
My last patch failed to take into account the scenario where other
packages depended on A where there were no version mismatches. Only
the case where there would have been a version mismatch after the
configure was checked for.
The ch
3 matches
Mail list logo
