Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:52:31AM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>> This one is because I changed my reply, but your original message was sent
>>> only to me and to the control bot.
>> Please go to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=168465 and
>> make sure th
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:52:31AM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > This one is because I changed my reply, but your original message was sent
> > only to me and to the control bot.
>
> Please go to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=168465 and
> make sure that my first message
Josip Rodin wrote:
>> That's right, command hasn't done anything, that fact is represented by
>> zeroes in statistics. There is the point - print statistics always after
>> install/remove operations.
>
> But the message just before that line already says the same. Who exactly
> needs the redundant
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:44:38PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >> I disagree. That's common statistics, printed in the end of each
> >> install/remove operation.
> >
> > The program hasn't done anything to affect any statistics. Do you really see
> > any point to printing the zeroes, and i
Josip Rodin wrote:
>> I disagree. That's common statistics, printed in the end of each
>> install/remove operation.
>
> The program hasn't done anything to affect any statistics. Do you really see
> any point to printing the zeroes, and if so could you clarify it?
That's right, command hasn't done
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:14:05PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> package apt
> tags 168465 +wontfix
> thanks
>
> >There's no point in printing the statistics for all these individual
> >requests, especially when they're all zeros (sometimes it'll include
> >other numbers, but that's still us
6 matches
Mail list logo
