Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I
> > > would like
> > > | > to request the same for the following packages:
> > > | >
> > > | >octave2.1, quantlib, r-base
> > > | >
> > > | > for the
> > > | >
> > > | >arm, m68k
Guys:
| >
| > architectures. I have spent *way* too much fscking special requests for
| > these smaller + older architecture which are, quite simply, mismatched for
| > these numerically-focussed applications and environments.
|
| Please convince a porter for those architectures to add the r
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:39:15AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]
> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k
>
> >
> > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in
3 matches
Mail list logo
